<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intellectual Property Expert Group (ipeg) &#187; Patent Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;cat=33" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 07:28:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Reputation and Intellectual Property</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=1516</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=1516#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ipeg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glynn Lunney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenspan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=1516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1999 Alan Greenspan, the former head of the US Federal Reserve, delivered a speech at Harvard University entitled “Transcending all else is being principled”. In it he said of reputation “In today&#8217;s world, where ideas are increasingly displacing the physical in the production of economic value, competition for reputation becomes a significant driving force, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1516</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Cliffs and lessons from 60 years pharmaceutical innovation</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=859</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=859#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ipeg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every now and then the ipeg blog pays attention to innovation. Although some of our readers think this is not something for a patent blog (we recently were commented by a known blogger in the US that ipeg could not be counted among the top ten patent blogs as we publish not solely on patents [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=859</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Brokers and their Headaches</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=826</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=826#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ipeg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Assume you are a patent broker. You are being approached by a party who is extremely enthusiastic about his patent, it’s the invention that will change the world, where anyone has been waiting for or that multiple parties use (read: infringe). However he tried to sell himself but he either did not get any bid, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=826</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IP Rankings, Credential or Kiss of Death?</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=795</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=795#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ipeg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The World's Leading IP Strategists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the IP Legal World Top Ten Lists are a staple of a culture obsessed with ranking. The IP legal world (patent attorneys, IP trial lawyers and their European counterparts) are used to do whatever it takes to show up on Top Lists of Best This And That, simply to stay competitive, to be known [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=795</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Integrity</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=721</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=721#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 13:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ipeg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Trolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent integrity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CIP Forum 2009, currently held in Goteborg, Sweden, covers lot of IP management issues from valuation, open innovation and the relationship with IP, and of course contributions where the Patent Troll prominently appears as the bad guys. No IP forum these days can go bye without at least at some occasion hit on the trolls. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=721</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Licensing in Europe &#8211; Still A Long Way To Go</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=707</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=707#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ipeg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OECD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SME]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How come licensing by European companies is largely lagging behind the US? A March 2009 OECD Study on licensing practice by European and Japanese patent holders tells the story. Zuniga and Guellec published a their study [1], “Who Licenses out Patent and Why?” using the outcome of the OECD survey (done in 2007). 600 European [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=707</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Perishables</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=670</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=670#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ipeg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perishables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qimonda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The effects on a company's patent portfolio when it goes bust]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=670</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Rules in 2012 &#8211; Including the IP World?</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=560</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=560#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ipeg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schneider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility model]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chinese utility model holder Chint completed its major victory at the Zhejiang High People&#8217;s Court in Chint v. Schneider over French competitor Schneider through an unprecedented $ 23 million settlement (RMB 157 million), approximately half the damages awarded two years ago by the Wenzhou Intermediate People&#8217;s Court.
Interestingly, in a 2007 publication, Harold Wegner and Sharon R. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=560</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Year&#8217;s End Thoughts on IP monetization</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=448</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=448#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ipeg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Trolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutional investor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP Monetization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Investment in IP as an asset class has grown significantly over the last years, however it is still in its infancy. Analysis of historical returns remains difficult, as limited data are available. Therefore, it is challenging to predict how the current economic crisis will impact on attitudes of institutional investors and the development of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=448</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Closed Auctions and the Risks of Willful Infringement</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=431</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=431#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ipeg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EPLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Trolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[closed auction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ebay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ocean Tomo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Auctions to sell assets have been known for long. Goethe proposed the publisher Vieweg in 1797 to sell his manuscript of his poem Hermann and Dorothea via an auction (later to become known as &#8220;a second-price auction&#8221;). In IP no doubt auctions have become a household practice thanks to Ocean Tomo&#8217;s regular auctions of patents. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=431</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
