<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IP Valuation &#8211; A Pandora&#8217;s Box</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=143</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:00:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Intellectual Property Expert Group (ipeg) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; INTA, ‘Ghost’ Brands and Trademarks</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=143&#038;cpage=1#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Intellectual Property Expert Group (ipeg) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; INTA, ‘Ghost’ Brands and Trademarks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.nl/blog/?p=143#comment-100</guid>
		<description>[...] is there not a more active divestiture practice in trademark world? We dealt with that in an earlier blog. Last year IPEG tried to raise interest in the subject at the Annual INTA conference. Not to much [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is there not a more active divestiture practice in trademark world? We dealt with that in an earlier blog. Last year IPEG tried to raise interest in the subject at the Annual INTA conference. Not to much [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
