<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intellectual Property Expert Group (ipeg)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipeg.eu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipeg.eu</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 13:47:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Invention harvesting</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/invention-harvesting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/invention-harvesting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 13:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ipeg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[featured articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idea generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/?p=4190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To invent means to produce or contrive something previously unknown by the use of ingenuity or imagination. An inventor is therefore someone who invents, someone who devises some new process, appliance, machine, or article. When a new product appears, the person who first thought of it, and who first defined what the product should be, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/invention-harvesting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reselling products in the USA, Part II: &#8220;First Sales&#8221; doctrine in patent</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/reselling-products-in-the-usa-part-ii-first-sales-doctrine-in-patent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/reselling-products-in-the-usa-part-ii-first-sales-doctrine-in-patent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 08:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ipeg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/?p=4184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Exhaustion,” also known as the “first sale doctrine,” has been the subject of two Supreme Court cases this term:  Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley &#38; Sons (copyright), which was decided on March 19, 2013, and Bowman v. Monsanto (patent), which was argued and submitted on February 19, 2013 and is awaiting decision.  A prior post discussed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/reselling-products-in-the-usa-part-ii-first-sales-doctrine-in-patent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reselling products in the USA, Part II: “First Sale” doctrine in patent</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/reselling-products-in-the-usa-part-ii-first-sale-doctrine-in-patent-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/reselling-products-in-the-usa-part-ii-first-sale-doctrine-in-patent-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 06:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Goldberg Lowenstein &#38; Weatherwax LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Goldberg Lowenstein & Weatherwax LLP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Patent Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/?p=4169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Exhaustion,” also known as the “first sale doctrine,” has been the subject of two Supreme Court cases this term:  Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley &#38; Sons (copyright), which was decided on March 19, 2013, and Bowman v. Monsanto (patent), which was argued and submitted on February 19, 2013 and is awaiting decision.  A prior post discussed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/reselling-products-in-the-usa-part-ii-first-sale-doctrine-in-patent-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New UPC Agreement, the Regulation and Standardization</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/the-new-upc-agreement-the-regulation-and-standardization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/the-new-upc-agreement-the-regulation-and-standardization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 15:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ipeg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EU Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRAND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standardization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPC agreement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/?p=4151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now European Patent with unitary effect finally got the final blessing, it is time look into  some of the details of the EU Regulation &#8220;Implementing Enhanced Cooperation in the area of the Creation of Unitary Patent Protection&#8221; 1257/2012 (UnitaryPatent Regulation &#8211; UPR). We do not mean the unfortunate referral to national law within Art. 5 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/the-new-upc-agreement-the-regulation-and-standardization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Signing of the UPC Agreement a milestone?</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/signing-of-the-upc-agreement-a-milestone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/signing-of-the-upc-agreement-a-milestone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 02:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>simmonsandsimmons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EPLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Patent Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simmons & Simmons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPLS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/?p=4133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 19 February 2013, officials from 24 European Member States signed the Unified Patent Court agreement establishing a Unified Patent Court (&#8220;UPC Agreement).[1] When you read this, Bulgaria will probably have signed as well. Poland and Spain did not sign but may still accede to the Agreement at a later date. Opening the signing ceremony, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/signing-of-the-upc-agreement-a-milestone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IP-centric businesses traded on public markets &#8211; a Popular Rise</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/ip-centric-businesses-traded-on-public-markets-a-popular-rise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/ip-centric-businesses-traded-on-public-markets-a-popular-rise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ipeg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent monetization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/?p=4099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IP-centric businesses whose shares trade on the public markets come in many shapes and sizes — some are better suited for return than others. Many of the most interesting IP-rich businesses, from an investor perspective, are publicly traded, thinly capitalized companies with experienced management. The best have a realistic view of their IP assets, usually patents, and the timing and cost of their disputes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/ip-centric-businesses-traded-on-public-markets-a-popular-rise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Value of Patents and the Endowment Effect</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/value-of-patents-and-the-endowment-effect-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/value-of-patents-and-the-endowment-effect-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ipeg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[featured articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endowment effect]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/?p=4085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As research has shown, owners have an incentive to exaggerate the valuation of their property. This is true for all kind of property but is it also true for intellectual property? People are reluctant to part with their property, and the amount that they are willing to accept to sell it generally far exceeds the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/value-of-patents-and-the-endowment-effect-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Viagra extended patent protection, generic wait until 2020</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/viagra-extended-patent-protection-generic-wait-until-2020/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/viagra-extended-patent-protection-generic-wait-until-2020/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ipeg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viagra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/?p=4077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. men seeking a generic version of Viagra (sildenafil citrate) – the first and the most popular prescription drug for Erectile Dysfunction (ED) – are going to have to wait for a few more years. Viagra’s patent, originally scheduled to expire in late March of 2012, has been extended to April of 2020. That’s good [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/viagra-extended-patent-protection-generic-wait-until-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of Intellectual Property Law</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/the-future-of-intellectual-property-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/the-future-of-intellectual-property-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 06:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ipeg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International IP Laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/?p=4065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Market failures, troubled access to medicine, impediments to free flow of information, copyright overextension, digital right protection, overkill and patents stifling rather than stimulating innovation are just a few of the disparaging themes around intellectual property. The main drives behind changes in IPR systems are growing discontent with the right to exclude, which is essential [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/the-future-of-intellectual-property-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Football Rights and Copyright Absurdity</title>
		<link>http://www.ipeg.eu/football-rights-and-copyright-absurdity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipeg.eu/football-rights-and-copyright-absurdity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 03:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ipeg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright maffia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[messi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volkskrant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipeg.eu/?p=4038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While travelling in Indonesia, as my morning drill, I read my newspaper, Volkskrant (from Netherlands) online. In this morning&#8217;s version, Volkskrant opens with the news that Lionel Messi broke a record of &#8220;Der Bomber&#8221;, when he made his goals against FC Betis Sevilla. The heading is &#8220;Messi Breaks Special Record Der Bomber&#8221;. So I click [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipeg.eu/football-rights-and-copyright-absurdity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
